The Data

As all the testing was performed with the exact same equipment (except the 140mm Noctua Industrial fans replace the 120mm GT fans), using the exact same methods as was used in the 360mm round-up, we have decided to keep this review uncluttered by keeping our testing methodology, test set-ups and equipment used in a single location. To see exactly how the tests were carried out, details of the test set ups and equipment used, please head over to the RRU Test Setup page.

Restriction Test

It is generally agreed that radiators are one of, if not the least restrictive components in a water cooling loop. There are some exceptions however, so this must still be verified through testing:

cool13The above photo is for referencing the restriction test bench The ST30 is not loaded so please disregard the readings in the picture as it does not relate to the its test results.

Here is the raw data at the tested flow rates, displaying the measured Differential Pressure across the radiator as flow rate was increased.
The table numbers indicate that this ST30 280 is a medium restriction radiator. However numbers in isolation can only tell half the story. By plotting against other components it more easily shows the whole story.

We use a HeatKiller 3.0 CPU block as the reference in this next plot for two reasons. Firstly there is little chance of the plot being cluttered by curves overlapping and secondly it gives a reference point against a fairly common loop component of average restriction.

As with all previous radiator restriction plots, we have limited the maximum flow rate displayed to 2.0 GPM as we suspect there are very few systems that operate above 2.0 GPM. For more information on how to read a restriction plot check out our guide.

This plot indicates the ST30 280 is a low restriction loop component when compared to a CPU block of average restriction, but what about other radiators?

The next three plots show the restriction level at three different flow rates compared to the other 280mm radiator that have been tested. We consider the chosen GPM rates to represent systems which have low, medium and high flow rates.



While the ST30 280 is one of the higher restriction radiators in the 280mm test group, we certainly don’t rate it as being high. It just reinforces our earlier statement that radiators are in general low restriction loop components.

In the following plot the data has been zoomed in to display only between 0.8 GPM and 1.2 GPM which is what an average system’s flow rate would be running at. Clearly there is not a lot of variance between the least restrictive radiators of the group.

Let’s now take a look at where the ST30 fits in relation to all the radiators we have tested. For this plot, only results for 1.0 GPM have been used for the comparison.

When put into context with all the radiators at 1.0 GPM, the ST30 280 fits into our criteria as a medium restriction radiator. This means you could comfortable run 2 or 3 ST30 series radiators without having to be  concerned about them reducing your flow rate by too much.

Excellent!!

Next onwards to Thermal Performance.

2 COMMENTS

  1. […] Alphacool ST30 280 Radiator Alphacool UT60 280 Radiator Review Alphacool Monsta 280 Radiator EK CE 280 Radiator Hardware Labs Nemesis GTS 280 Radiator Hardware Labs Nemesis GTS 280 X-Flow Radiator Hardware Labs Nemesis GTX 280 Radiator Hardware Labs SR2 Radiator XSPC AX 280 Radiator […]

  2. this rad is very special in a way that it’s probably the smallest 280 rad. it’s not only thinner, it’s also shorter and narrower than other 280 rads. for example it is almost 1cm narrower than HWLabs GTS 280. this small size allows to use it in systems were no other 280 rad will fit. for example in Fractal Design Define S/C series of cases, only alphacool 140/280/420 rads will fit the front. so it performs quite well considering the size.
    what i’d like to see is the performance comparison with 240 rads

Comments are closed.