Watercool Heatkiller IV CPU Water Block Review

The Watercool Heatkiller III has been around for a long long time.  In fact it was an older design when we first tested it in our 2012 CPU water block roundup.  It did respectably in that roundup given that it was an older design and as newer blocks launched it seemed to become less popular.  Watercool is finally back with a new design that they’ve been working on for years now – the Heatkiller IV.  While the name is hardly surprising let’s see if it lives up to the hype!

DSC_1233While we’d love to think that Watercool were so cocky we’d that they sent three versions of it the reality is somewhat different.  The Heatkiller IV comes in Pro and Basic versions.  While they look very similar, the internals are not and so that’s the real reason Watercool sent us a variety to test.

DSC_1235

While we got to test two “Pro” versions and one “Basic” edition there are plenty of choices.  The pro comes in Nickel Copper, “Copper An”, Pure Copper, Acrylic, Acrylic Clean and Acetal versions while the basic comes in Acetal and Acrylic only.  “Copper An” stands for Anthracite Nickel Plated Copper – in other words a darker nickel.

All the packages came with the same box and instructions:

DSC_1236

This one is the Pro Copper Anthracite:

DSC_1237In addition to the bilingual and very thorough instructions accessories to mount the block were included for Intel sockets:

DSC_1239It should be noted that for 1150/1155/1156 sockets there is an optional backplate you can also buy in addition.

DSC_1242From left to right:  Pro Pure Copper, Pro Copper Anthracite, Basic Acetal.  In addition to the packaging materials and the plastic wrap the base of each block was protected also:

DSC_1243

The base was not polished and  so machining marks visible but they followed a nice arc

DSC_1244

This gave the impression of quality machining rather than a sloppy finish:

DSC_1245

The mounting plates also have a similar machined finish, in fact the edges are so crisply cut that they aren’t far from being sharp!

DSC_1249

All three blocks had a pleasing high quality feel:

DSC_1246The Basic edition with it’s plain acetal top looked the cheapest, and it’s light weight reinforced this notion:

DSC_1253This is not to say it feels cheap though because it is far from that.  However the Pro editions just really feel very high quality indeed:

DSC_1247While the Pure Copper has a copper top and base the Copper Anthracite has a nickel plated base which we will see better when we take it apart:

DSC_1252

Just for reference – the Heatkiller III alongside:

DSC_1771

So overall great looking and solid blocks with a sturdy looking mount.  Let’s poke around at the insides next!

5 COMMENTS

  1. Greetings from Germany!

    Awesome review, thorough as usual and very much appreciated.

    While it may be impractical to add another block to the restriction graph, a graph with select blocks would be nice.

    i remember a tweaked/moded HK3 on skinnees (http://skinneelabs.com/heatkiller-3-0-lt-lc/2/) for those with a HK3 it might be interesting to see how it compares. Vapor had an improvement of 1.3 deg C which would in theory even beat the HK4. 😮

    all the best
    DX2
    p.s. i had a question about your testing, i sent an email.

  2. greetings from Germany!

    Awesome review, thorough as usual.
    A restriction graph of the HK4 as a link or compared to a select few would be nice.

    i remember on skinnees, Vapor reviewed the HK3 LT. He tweaked/modded it getting 1.3 DegC improvement. It would be really interesting to see if the tweak delivers, assuming it does, it would even beat the HK4 :-O

    all the best keep the reviews coming!
    i had a question about your testing. i sent a email. ^_^

  3. greetings from Germany!

    Awesome review, thorough as usual. Keep up the good work!

    A restriction graph ith a select set of blocks would still be nice tbh.
    The HK3 LT review from skinnee included a modded HK3. It was 1.8 Deg better than unmodded if those result hold true the modded hzk3 might best the HK4. It would be awesome if you tried the mod!!

    many kind regards
    DX2
    p.s. i sent a question via email.

  4. I’m curios about the price differences in these blocks. Was the universal back plate necessary at all? It adds ~12USD more to the overall price. Currently, this will make it ~100USD simply for the cpu waterblock. Just curios to know if they’re any help, or if they’re required.

    • Honestly I haven’t tried it, and of course its only needed for socket 115x, but I would be reluctant to not use it. CPU blocks can mount with a fair bit of pressure, and I’d want to avoid bending the board.

LEAVE A REPLY